tnt: thesaurus

[azuire]

Reminders: This week's topic and editing post! Both are due this Saturday, so I hope everyone's on top of their game. (If not, best of luck!)

Remember, if you have suggestions for prompts or TnT topics, feel free to let the mods know :)

---

Some writers really like their thesauruses.

I mean really. I think it's fantastic to learn new words (cachinnate), or see a less used one pop up (defenestrate, vitriol), but when I have to stop reading and run for the dictionary, it becomes a nuisance (asseverate).

What do you think about Thesaurus Word of the Day? Should we dip into less-used words to write, or will everyday language suffice?

Comments

[cariadwen]

I've been in many a muddled situations because to me the American system of labelling floors is natural as the first floor you come to is called the first floor. Sensible! It took me ages to learn that as a Brit I had to go to the 'ground floor' if I wanted to get to the entrance. To me it's counter intuititive. Even now after all these years I still need to remind myself what floor I'm aiming for.

[ex_pippin880]

But what if the first floor you come to isn't the first floor, but the basement/below ground, or the second storey?

[cariadwen]

LOl My head just stopped spinning! If I get into the building at pavement level at the public entrance, to me that should be the first floor. If there's a floor underneath that it should be the basement. Whenever I press the ground floor button on a lift I hold my breath incase I'm taken to the basement.

It's like in Britain hunting pinks are actually red. And white horses are called 'grey. It doesn't make any sense to me. The description of a man in a red coat on a whilte horse is so much more real life than a man in a pink coat on a grey horse. It doesn't give the right picture in my head.

And yes I do know the convoluted (to me) explainations on why pink and grey are used in those contexts. I just feel like the little boy who yells "But the emporer has no clothes." Just because everyone does it and it's always been done, does it make it right?

[ex_pippin880]

If you start calling grey horses "white", what are you going to call the actually white horses? :/

[cariadwen]

In the British horsey world there are no such things white horses, they are all grey. Their logic is that while the hair on the animals are white, the skin underneath is often spotted or grey. My argument is polar bears have white fur but underneath have black skin but we don't refer to them as black, now do we?

I think in pictures so accurate colour is important to me.

[ex_pippin880]

White horses are pink-skinned. I must confess, I don't know whether or not they are banned from Britain, so you could be correct.

The polar bear situation is a pretty poor straw man, honestly. :/

[cariadwen]

In other countries white horses are called white regardless of what colour their skin underneath the hair. They aren't banned here just that if the local language calls them white, then we will call them white by the language of the country they came from.


Why is the polar bear situation a straw man? It is logical consquence

[ex_pippin880]

I just... don't understand what your concern about this is, honestly. Some specialists decided that this was an important distinction to make, and some laypeople use their terminology while others don't. All words are just symbols, with no actual truth behind them. It's like getting upset if people with physics backgrounds use "mass" instead of "weight", because "weight" for them symbolises something slightly differently.


if the local language calls them white, then we will call them white by the language of the country they came from.

...I can't parse this sentence. You make it sound like you'd call Italian white horses "bianco horses"...?


Well. There's only one sort of polar bear (plus albino-ism, maybe?): black-skinned, white-furred. And no one breeds polar bears. So (a) you don't need to designate between colours of polar bears in the first place (if I say "polar bear" you imagine a black-skinned, white-furred polar bear -- I don't need to say "white polar bear"), (b) there aren't any white-furred nonblack-skinned polar bears to distinguish against (other than albinos, and you'd say "albino polar bear" for that), and (c) there's no money or reputation on the line regarding their colour.

Whereas: (a) there are a lot of different horse coat colours, (b) there is a distinction between white-haired pink-skinned and white-haired grey-skinned, and (c) there is money and reputation associated with breeding white or grey horses.

These two situations aren't really compatible for logical argument.

[cariadwen]

"I just... don't understand what your concern about this is, honestly. Some specialists decided that this was an important distinction to make, and some laypeople use their terminology while others don't. All words are just symbols, with no actual truth behind them. It's like getting upset if people with physics backgrounds use "mass" instead of "weight", because "weight" for them symbolises something slightly differently."

:) Now who said I was upset? Sorry if I come across that way but I'm directed when I debate, it certainly wasn't done to upset you in anyway. I'm just debating the power of words. This is the topic this week isn't it? The white and grey horse thing was simply a stray comment on the erractic usuage of the English language. Which I love by the way.


"...I can't parse this sentence. You make it sound like you'd call Italian white horses "bianco horses"...?"

Yes we do! And Palamino which also means white.



"(c) there's reputation on the line regarding their colour."

Now that's a good point and logical. If I had given up at your pulling the straw man line I would never have heard it from you and thus considered it.

"Whereas: (a) there are a lot of different horse coat colours, (b) there is a distinction between white-haired pink-skinned and white-haired grey-skinned, and (c) there is money and reputation associated with breeding white or grey horses."

Now I might have missed this vital bit of horse sense because no one in my section of the horsey world was bothered by breed, not when you can buy a sturdy mongral for £50. So another good point. :)

"These two situations aren't really compatible for logical argument."

Of course they are, until you factor in breeding lines, then it becomes incompatible and only then.

Please don't take things so seriously I'm not really a dragon, honestly!

[cariadwen]

A bit about me, I'm 60 and was born and bred in Wales. When I moved into a post industral village in the south, in the late 70's it was as common to see a horse tied to the front gate as it was for a car to be parked outside.

In fact horse ownership was more common than having a bathroom and having a bathroom was more common than having central heating. The local hunt was run by ex-miners and you could buy a horse for £50. So naturally every little girl got what they wanted.

I'm not saying I'm a horse expert, because I'm not, just that the whole terminalogoy is something I've had experience in.